Paid, scoped reviews of real research records across biology, chemistry and materials. Whether you run the experiments, the program or the science of a whole company, there is a tier for you, and each one pays more.
We place you by the responsibility you have actually held, not by title or publication count. Each tier judges a larger share of a research archive, and pays accordingly.
You run the experiments Assay scientists · Analytical chemists · Method developers $75–140/hr 
You run the program Program leads · Project scientists · Discovery leads $130–220/hr 
You ran the science at scale Fractional CSOs · Portfolio advisors · Former R&D leaders $220–400/hr Hands-on method judgment
$75–140/hr
Your experience. You design, run, validate, troubleshoot or interpret experiments yourself.
What you review. Actual runs, controls, outputs and failure modes, and the context a record is missing.
Experimental strategy
$130–220/hr
Your experience. You owned a program’s hypothesis, experimental path, revisions and stop or continue calls.
What you review. Whether results and protocol changes actually support the decisions a program recorded.
Scientific portfolio judgment
$220–400/hr
Your experience. You set scientific direction, chose programs and allocated resources across many of them.
What you review. The evidence behind portfolio choices, and how the programs in an archive relate.
Failed runs and stopped programs count. The reasoning around them is often the most valuable part of an archive.
Each tier pays more because each judges a larger share of the record. Your rate is confirmed in writing before any brief.
A short, scoped brief. You never see sensitive files before permissions are in place, and scope, fee and turnaround are agreed before you start.
A scoped set of real research records, inside your own methods and level of judgment.
What supports each call, what was revised, and what context is missing.
Pursue, request more, or pass, with your reasons written down.
Help build a reusable rubric that judges scientific records the way an expert would.
Consultants, fractional scientific leaders, former program leaders and experienced practitioners. Employed scientists and academics are welcome too, once outside work is cleared with your employer.
You get one primary tier, based on what you designed, ran, decided or directed. Everything else you know becomes a tag on your profile, so you can still be matched to work outside your tier.
Your scientific area, the techniques you know, and how deep you go.
What you designed, ran, validated, troubleshot or interpreted yourself.
A single decision or experiment, described without confidential detail.
Availability, fee expectations, employer permission and any conflicts.
Assess computational biology, genomic analyses, and reproducible research workflows.
Review complex reasoning about neural systems, cognition, and experimental evidence.
Evaluate biological mechanisms, experimental design, and molecular research findings.
Evaluate plant science, ecological systems, and specialist biological research.
Review food-science evidence, nutrition research, and technical product-development cases.
Review materials properties, characterization, and research-driven design decisions.
Apply in about ten minutes. We will match you to a tier and a first paid brief that fits your methods.
